Fraud over $5,000 is charged under section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code. It can only be prosecuted by indictment and carries up to 14 years in prison. A discharge is not available, a conditional sentence served in the community still can be, and a two-year minimum applies once the total value passes $1 million. This guide explains what that means for a first offence, how bail and sentencing work, and how the charge is defended. For every kind of fraud charge, from under $5,000 to identity and insurance fraud, see our fraud defence overview.

One moment you're a professional managing clients, finances, or corporate matters — the next you're facing an allegation of fraud over $5,000. In Toronto, this charge is serious and requires expert criminal defence. At Daniel Brown Law LLP, we defend complex fraud cases. When facing an allegation this serious, securing the help of an experienced Toronto criminal lawyer is not optional. The legal process that follows is demanding, and the stakes are high.

The charge
s. 380(1)(a)Criminal Code, indictment only
Maximum sentence
14 yearsThe same maximum at any value over $5,000
Mandatory minimum
2 yearsOnly where the total exceeds $1 million
Discharge
Not availableBecause the maximum is 14 years (s. 730)

What makes a fraud “over $5,000”?

One offence, three sets of consequences. Where the value of the alleged fraud lands decides how the case is prosecuted and what sentence is possible.

Art Deco poster of three rising columns of coins on one plinth, the middle column in orange

Fraud involving a will or other testamentary instrument is treated as fraud over $5,000 whatever its value. Fraud is not theft: theft over $5,000 carries up to 10 years and can be prosecuted summarily (s. 334(a)); fraud over $5,000 cannot. Since July 2026 a court must go below the two-year minimum if it would be cruel and unusual punishment for that offender (s. 718.4), though the sentence is still imprisonment.

Understanding a fraud over $5,000 charge in Ontario

The value decides the charge

Under section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada, fraud where the value of the subject-matter exceeds $5,000 is an indictable offence. Conviction carries a maximum of 14 years in prison. Where the total value of the frauds exceeds $1 million, a mandatory minimum of 2 years applies (s. 380(1.1)). The value is the value of the property, money or service involved, not the amount the Crown can show was finally lost. Daniel Brown Law's fraud defence page covers the threshold and penalties in depth.

Not a lesser, white-collar charge

This isn't a white-collar label that carries less weight. A fraud charge brings the same hard consequences as serious violent offences: criminal record, employment risk, licensing impact, and travel restrictions.

The Crown must still prove fraud

The value only matters once the Crown proves the offence itself: a dishonest act, a deprivation — which can be a loss or just putting someone’s money at risk — and that you knew both. That is where most fraud cases are fought, and it is covered under defences below.

Bail conditions: the immediate impact

Before any trial determines guilt or innocence, bail conditions can significantly restrict your life. A person with no criminal record may be released directly from the police station on an undertaking. Others will face a formal bail hearing. Those conditions can require you to surrender your passport and stay in jurisdiction. If you work in accounting, finance, or any regulated field, bail terms can also directly interfere with your job.

At a bail hearing the Crown usually has to justify detention or any condition it asks for. The onus flips to you if you are not ordinarily resident in Canada, or if you are charged while already on release for another indictable offence. Since July 2026 you must then show that your release plan clearly addresses the risks the court is concerned about (Criminal Code s. 515(6)).

If convicted: the long-term stakes

A conviction for fraud over $5,000 carries consequences that can last a lifetime:

Value of the fraud Maximum Summary or minimum
Over $5,000s. 380(1)(a) 14 years Indictment only
Over $1 million in totals. 380(1.1) 14 years 2-year minimum
$5,000 or unders. 380(1)(b) 2 years 2 years less a day and/or $5,000 fine

Maximums on indictment. Fraud of $5,000 or under is shown for comparison; it can also be prosecuted summarily, where the general maximum applies (s. 787).

Maximum penalty

14 years imprisonment under s. 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code.

Mandatory minimum

2 years for frauds exceeding $1 million under s. 380(1.1). The values of all the counts are added together to reach that figure.

Criminal record

Permanent. Affects travel to the US, immigration status, and employment in any field requiring a criminal record check. Because a discharge is not available, a finding of guilt means a conviction.

Prohibition and forfeiture

The court can prohibit you from any job or volunteer role that gives you authority over other people’s real property, money or valuable securities, for any period it considers appropriate (s. 380.2). Property proven to be proceeds of the crime can be forfeited (s. 462.37).

Restitution order

Under s. 738(1)(a), a court can order the offender to repay the victim’s loss, up to the replacement value of the property where that amount is readily ascertainable. The court must consider restitution in every case (s. 737.1), and the offender’s ability to pay does not prevent an order (s. 739.1). If it goes unpaid, the victim can file it and enforce it like a civil judgment (s. 741).

Aggravating factors at sentencing

Section 380.1 requires the court to treat these as aggravating:

  • the magnitude, complexity, duration or degree of planning of the fraud was significant;
  • it affected, or could have affected, the stability of the Canadian economy, its financial system or markets, or investor confidence;
  • it involved a large number of victims;
  • it had a significant impact on the victims given their age, health and financial situation;
  • the offender took advantage of the high regard in which they were held in the community;
  • the offender did not comply with a licensing requirement or professional standard that normally applies;
  • the offender concealed or destroyed records of the fraud or of where its proceeds went.

Abusing a position of trust or authority over the victim is aggravating too (s. 718.2(a)(iii)).

What does a first offence mean for fraud over $5,000?

Many people charged with fraud over $5,000 have never been in court before. A clean record matters at sentencing, but the law narrows the options in four ways.

No discharge

A discharge, which avoids a conviction, is not available for any offence with a 14-year maximum (s. 730(1)). A first offender found guilty of fraud over $5,000 is convicted. That makes an outcome that avoids a finding of guilt — a withdrawal, a resolution to a different charge, or an acquittal — especially valuable.

A conditional sentence is possible

A sentence of less than two years can be served in the community under strict conditions, including house arrest, if the court is satisfied that would not endanger the community and fits the principles of sentencing (s. 742.1). It is not available where the two-year minimum applies.

Good character counts, within limits

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has held that for large-scale commercial frauds, denunciation and general deterrence must dominate. Prior good character is still a mitigating factor, but it does not on its own take the sentence out of the usual range (R v Drabinsky, 2011 ONCA 582). And a job, skills or reputation that were used to commit the fraud cannot be treated as mitigating (s. 380.1(2)).

Repayment and the amount matter

How much was involved, whether anyone actually lost money, and whether it has been repaid all affect where a sentence falls. Repayment should be handled through your lawyer, because it can affect the defence as well as the sentence.

Why early legal engagement matters

The first 24 to 48 hours after an investigation begins are often determinative. At Daniel Brown Law, we move fast to:

  • Secure your Charter rights — including protections under s. 8 (search and seizure) and s. 11(b) (unreasonable delay)
  • Preserve evidence — financial records, emails, and electronic data can disappear or be misrepresented early
  • Work before charges are laid to negotiate with police or the Crown where possible

A proactive approach before charges are filed sometimes prevents them entirely. Do not speak to investigators — police, an employer, a bank or an insurer — before you have legal advice.

Fraud defence strategies in Toronto

An arrest is the start of the legal process, not the end. A skilled defence lawyer has several avenues to challenge the Crown's case.

Art Deco poster of a magnifying glass held over an open ledger with rays of light

Strategy 1: Challenging the investigation and procedure

Charter violations

Attacks: how the evidence was gathered

Searches of electronic devices without a proper warrant can violate your rights under s. 8 of the Charter. Evidence obtained unlawfully can be excluded at trial.

Unreasonable delay

Attacks: the time to trial

Your right to be tried within a reasonable time is protected by s. 11(b). Excessive delays caused by Crown or police inaction can result in a stay of proceedings.

Disclosure failures

Attacks: the fairness of the trial

The Crown must provide all relevant information to the defence. Failing to produce disclosure in a meaningful, usable format — for a large electronic file, one that can actually be searched — can breach your right to make a full answer and defence.

Strategy 2: Attacking the Crown's evidence

Inadmissible bank records

Attacks: the paper trail

Under s. 29 of the Canada Evidence Act, copies of bank records are not admissible unless it is first proved — by a bank employee with knowledge of the records, orally or by affidavit — that the record is one of the bank’s ordinary records, that the entry was made in the usual and ordinary course of business, that the bank still holds it, and that the copy is true. Without that, the records may be excluded.

Inadmissible business documents

Attacks: the paper trail

Section 30 imposes similar strict requirements for other business records, including at least seven days’ notice before they are produced. A defence lawyer scrutinizes every document to ensure technical compliance.

Strategy 3: No intent to defraud

The most powerful defence is often attacking the mens rea. The Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you knew what you were doing and knew it could put someone else’s money or property at risk. It is enough that you were reckless about that risk, and believing the conduct was not wrong is no defence.. What the Crown cannot do is turn a careless mistake into a crime.

Fraud vs. business failure

Attacks: dishonesty

Canadian law distinguishes criminal fraud from negligent misrepresentation or poor business judgment; the Supreme Court excluded careless statements, improvident business conduct and sharp practice in Théroux. Scrambling to save a failing business does not automatically constitute fraud. Using other people’s money in a way you had no right to, even hoping to repay it, can be.

Absence of concealment

Attacks: the inference of intent

Courts look for signs of dishonest intent — diversion of funds for personal use, deliberate concealment. If your actions were transparent and documented, that undercuts the inference of intent to deceive.

Authority and reliance

Attacks: knowledge

Acting on board direction, following established rules, or relying on instructions from a person in authority can negate dishonest intent.

How our team defends fraud allegations

Fraud cases are won or lost in the documents. This is how we take them apart.

Examining the investigation

Complex fraud investigations involve search warrants, business record seizures, forensic accounting, and interviews under caution. We challenge improper warrants, over-broad authorizations, and delays that breach the Charter. If police entered a business without proper justification, or executed a search after a warrant expired, there may be grounds to exclude evidence.

Probing the Crown's evidence

The prosecution's case typically rests on a paper trail — bank records, invoices, ledgers, spreadsheets, internal communications. These documents have weaknesses: authentication gaps, missing chain-of-custody documentation, assumptions underlying loss calculations. We examine every page and, where warranted, retain forensic accountants or digital forensic experts.

Demonstrating lack of intent

What looks like misconduct often has a legitimate explanation: poor recordkeeping, a misunderstanding about authority, reliance on others who misled you, or decisions made under board direction. We build those arguments carefully, with supporting documentation. Where appropriate, we explore restitution-driven negotiations or make a case for Crown withdrawal based on the facts.

What happens after a fraud over $5,000 charge?

Fraud cases move slowly and on paper. Early decisions — what to say, what to pay, what to preserve — can shape the whole case.

  1. Investigation

    Many fraud cases start with a bank, employer or insurer investigation and police production orders for records, long before anyone is charged.

  2. Charge and release

    Most people are released by police on an undertaking or after a bail hearing, usually with conditions.

  3. Disclosure

    Your first appearance begins disclosure rather than completing it. In fraud cases it is often voluminous and arrives in stages.

  4. Choosing the court

    Because the maximum is 14 years, you elect to be tried by a provincial court judge, by a judge alone in the Superior Court, or by a judge and jury (s. 536(2)). If you choose the Superior Court, you can ask for a preliminary inquiry (s. 535).

  5. Resolution or trial

    Some cases end in a withdrawal or a resolution to a lesser or different charge; others go to trial.

  6. Appeal, if needed

    A conviction or sentence can be appealed.

Why hire Daniel Brown Law?

Daniel Brown Law is a leading Canadian criminal defence firm. Our lawyers handle every stage — from pre-charge advocacy through to complex criminal appeals.

A nationally recognized defence firm

Daniel Brown Law has defended both small and large-scale fraud cases, achieving acquittals by identifying significant problems with prosecution evidence. The firm is ranked among Canada's Top Criminal Law Boutiques by Canadian Lawyer Magazine and consistently recognized for criminal defence excellence.

Professionals and first-time accused

Our clients are often professionals and first-time accused. We understand the personal and reputational stakes, and we know how to handle media scrutiny and parallel regulatory proceedings alongside the criminal defence.

Built for document-heavy cases

Forensic accounting reports, bank records, production orders and years of emails are the ordinary material of a fraud prosecution. We read them for what the Crown’s summary leaves out.

Recognized by the profession and the public

Daniel Brown Law is ranked among Canada’s top criminal law boutiques by Canadian Lawyer, listed by The Globe and Mail and Best Law Firms for criminal defence, and voted Best Legal Services by Toronto Star readers. Five of its lawyers are recognized by Best Lawyers in Canada for criminal defence.

The Globe and Mail Best Law Firms 2026, Criminal Law

Best Law Firms: Criminal Law

The Globe and Mail, 2026

Canadian Lawyer Top Criminal Law Boutique 2026-27

Top Criminal Law Boutique

Canadian Lawyer, 2026–27

Best Law Firms Canada, Criminal Defence Tier 1, 2026

Criminal Defence, Tier 1

Best Law Firms Canada, 2026

Best Lawyers in Canada 2027, Daniel Brown Law

Best Lawyers in Canada

Criminal Defence, 2027

Toronto Star Readers' Choice winner seal

Toronto Star Readers’ Choice

Best Law Firm and Best Legal Services, repeat winner

Chambers Canada 2027, Ranked in Canada, Daniel Brown Law

Crime, Nationwide

Chambers Canada, 2027

The firm and its lawyers have been repeatedly recognized for excellence in criminal defence:

FAQs: Fraud over $5,000 in Toronto

Short answers to the questions people ask most after a fraud over $5,000 charge.

The charge

What is fraud over $5,000?

An offence under s. 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code where the value of the property, money or service involved exceeds $5,000. It is an indictable offence with a maximum of 14 years in prison.

Is fraud over $5,000 always an indictable offence?

Yes. Fraud over $5,000 is always prosecuted as an indictable offence, which carries the maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment.

What is the minimum sentence for fraud over $5,000?

There is no minimum unless the total value of the frauds exceeds $1 million, when a two-year minimum applies (s. 380(1.1)). Since July 2026 a court must impose less than that minimum if it would be cruel and unusual punishment for the particular offender (s. 718.4).

First offence and sentencing

Can I avoid jail time?

Depending on the facts, yes. For first-time offenders or cases with weak evidence, we have negotiated outcomes including charge withdrawals, non-custodial sentences, and community-based dispositions. Engage experienced counsel early.

Can I get a discharge for a first-offence fraud over $5,000?

No. A discharge is not available for an offence with a 14-year maximum (s. 730(1)). A conditional sentence of less than two years, served in the community, can be available where the two-year minimum does not apply (s. 742.1).

Will a restitution order cover a civil claim?

A restitution order is enforceable like a civil judgment, but it doesn't prevent the victim from pursuing a separate civil lawsuit (s. 741.2).

Defending the case

Can fraud charges be dropped before trial?

Yes. We challenge whether the Crown has sufficient evidence, whether Charter breaches occurred, and whether alternative explanations exist. That may lead the Crown to withdraw or reduce charges.

Does paying back the money guarantee withdrawal of charges?

No. Restitution is relevant and sometimes assists in plea discussions, but it doesn't automatically result in a withdrawal. Consult us before making any offers or admissions.

What is the strongest defence to a fraud charge?

Contesting the mens rea. The Crown must prove you knew what you were doing and knew it could put someone else’s money or property at risk. Establishing that your actions were a business error, reliance on authority, or misunderstanding — rather than deliberate deception — can create reasonable doubt.

Will there be a preliminary inquiry?

Only if you ask for one. Because fraud over $5,000 carries 14 years, you can request a preliminary inquiry if you elect a trial in the Superior Court, by a judge alone or with a jury (ss. 535 and 536(2)).

Your life while the case is on

Will I lose my job or professional licence if I'm charged?

Possibly. A fraud charge is a crime of dishonesty and can trigger regulatory hearings, licence consequences, or employment termination. We assist with both the criminal defence and the parallel professional risk strategy.

Can I travel while under a fraud charge?

Bail conditions often restrict travel, but we routinely negotiate bail variations so clients can maintain work or family travel commitments while the criminal process continues.

Next steps: talk to Daniel Brown Law before you talk to investigators

If you or someone you know is under investigation for fraud over $5,000, or has already been charged, do not speak to investigators before retaining a lawyer.

Contact Daniel Brown Law at (416) 297-7200 for a confidential consultation. Our team acts immediately to protect your rights, your career, and your freedom.

Office: Daniel Brown Law, 400–103 Church St., Toronto, ON M5C 2G3